Commentary>The Monitor's View
from the June 03, 2002 edition

Hot Preemption

What better place for a president to set a new military doctrine than at West Point, the incubator for Army officers. Mr. Bush told graduating cadets on Saturday to put aside old war concepts such as deterrence or containment.
E-mail this story
Write a letter to the Editor
Printer-friendly version

The new doctrine? Take the battle to the enemy.

Instead of a passively maintaining military might against enemy nations, Bush warned that the US must use a strike-first strategy to "uncover terror cells in 60 or more countries."

This "hot preemption" is also the new strategy at the FBI, which last week shifted to preventing terrorist acts, not just investigating old crimes.

If now "the only defense is a good offense," then the US has taken on a new moral purpose in rooting out people merely intent on evil acts. Defining them, locating them, while doing no harm to others will require much more delicate but aggressive tactics.

Fortunately, Bush also said a "just peace" means replacing poverty, repression, and resentment with hope for all people. Will the US be as aggressive in that battlefield? It should, if it plans to preempt the hatred that lies behind terrorism.




Get Monitor stories by e-mail:
(Your e-mail address will be protected by csmonitor.com's tough privacy policy.)

Photos of the Day:
The best photos from Jan. 06, 2009

ELECTION '08 Patchwork Nation
The American voter beyond red and blue

FISHERIES Empty Oceans Series
The sea is no longer so vast.


Daily podcast

Monitor Reports

Discussions with Monitor reporters from around the world


Today

Pat Murphy

The view from the Arab world on the Israel-Hamas conflict in Gaza.




Today's print issue
Today's Issue of The Christian Science Monitor